I’m Mushegh Manukyan, Founder & CEO of ARMCP. I work at the intersection of crypto information, real-time market data, blockchain utilities, product building, and clearer digital-asset regulation.
8+ years mining, trading & investing contextYerevan building from ArmeniaEN / RU / FR / ES platform language coverage
A useful crypto product should show its evidence, not ask for blind trust.
Prices move quickly, but speed alone does not make information reliable. A product should preserve when an event happened, when it arrived, what transformed it, how confident the system was, and why a decision was accepted or quarantined. That principle connects my work across market data, community information, trading tools, and blockchain utilities.
What I work on
One information problem, viewed from four sides
These are working themes, not claims that every problem has already been solved.
01 / DATA
Market information with visible freshness
Real-time dashboards need more than a latest price. I focus on provenance, clock order, source fallbacks, stale-state handling, and explanations that users can evaluate.
Source and receive timestamps
Degraded-mode behavior
Confidence and lineage signals
02 / TOOLS
Blockchain utilities that reduce friction
Useful Web3 tools should turn chain-level details into deliberate actions. The work is to expose risk and state without making the interface harder to understand.
Clear transaction context
Explicit network and asset state
Human-readable failure paths
03 / POLICY
Regulation translated into product choices
Technology and regulation are often discussed as opposing forces. I’m interested in the practical middle: rules that can become clearer flows, disclosures, and controls.
Understandable user boundaries
Traceable product decisions
Responsible access patterns
04 / STARTUPS
Products that learn without hiding uncertainty
Startup speed matters, but ambiguous metrics and silent assumptions compound quickly. I prefer small, inspectable experiments with an honest path from signal to decision.
Testable product hypotheses
Observable operational states
Feedback tied to real behavior
Working method
From event to explanation
My preferred product loop is deliberately compact. It keeps a team close to the evidence while leaving room for iteration.
01
Define the decision
State what the system or user must decide before selecting data, tools, or interface patterns.
02
Capture the evidence path
Record clocks, source, transformations, confidence, and degraded states as first-class product information.
03
Make failure legible
Prefer an explicit stale, quarantined, or unavailable state over a confident-looking answer built on weak inputs.
04
Review with users
Observe whether people can understand the result, its limits, and the action available to them.
Interactive field note / 01
Market Evidence Envelope Inspector
A browser-only exercise for testing whether a synthetic market event can support its claimed decision. It validates source, event, receive, and decision clocks; traces lineage; applies explicit confidence thresholds; and explains deterministic failures with the actual input values.
My startup-building context includes participation or recognition connected with BAJ Accelerator, AICA, K-Startup, and K2Match. I treat these as learning environments and network touchpoints—not substitutes for measurable product value.